The Organization of Firms across Countries
نویسندگان
چکیده
We collect original data on the firm organization in several thousand firms located in the US, Europe and Asia. Specifically, we focus on the autonomy of production plant managers from their Corporate Headquarters in their decisions over hiring, investment, production and sales. We find that American and Northern European firms are much more decentralized than those from Southern Europe and Asia, both domestically and as multinationals abroad. Three factors are associated with greater decentralization. First, stronger product market competition, which arguably makes manager’s local knowledge more important because of greater time-sensitivity of decision-making. Second, higher trust in the plant’s region of location (and multinational’s home country), which may help to sustain effective delegation because of enhanced co-operation. And third, the prevalence of hierarchical religions, such as Catholicism and Islam, which may lead managers to have weaker preferences for autonomous decision making. These factors appear important across countries, across regions within countries, and for multinationals according to their country of ownership. Since information technology appears complementary with more decentralized organizations this implies Catholic countries with lower trust, like France and Italy, may benefit less from rapid technological change than Protestant countries with higher trust, like Sweden and the US. JEL No. L2, M2, O32, O33.
منابع مشابه
CEP Discussion Paper No 966 January 2010 Does Product Market Competition Lead Firms to Decentralize ?
There is a widespread sense that over the last two decades firms have been decentralizing decisions to employees further down the managerial hierarchy. Economists have developed a range of theories to account for delegation, but there is less empirical evidence, especially across countries. This has limited the ability to understand the phenomenon of decentralization. To address the empirical l...
متن کاملThe determinants of capital structure across firms’ sizes: The U.K evidence
This paper explores the leverage determinants across firms’ sizesbased on the two main theories behind the capital structure, the trade-offand the pecking order theories. A panel data is sued to find therelationship between capital structure and the variables that proxy forbenefits and costs of debt during 1990 to 2006. Our findings show thatboth principles help to explain the capital structure...
متن کاملA R T I C L E S Management Practices Across Firms and Countries
Executive Overview For the past decade we have been using double-blind survey techniques and randomized sampling to construct management data on more than 10,000 organizations across 20 countries. On average, we find that in manufacturing American, Japanese, and German firms are the best managed. Firms in developing countries, such as Brazil, China, and India, tend to be poorly managed. America...
متن کاملCorporate Hierarchies and International Trade: Theory and Evidence
Corporate organization varies within countries and between countries. We develop a theory which explains the variation in levels of decentralization across firms and links it to the trade environment that firms face. We introduce firms with internal hierarchies in a Melitz and Ottaviano (2008) model of international trade. We show that international trade increases the conflict of interest betw...
متن کاملDoes Product Market Competition Lead Firms to Decentralize?
There is a widespread sense that over the last two decades firms have been decentralizing decisions to employees further down the managerial hierarchy. Economists have developed a range of theories to account for delegation, but there is less empirical evidence, especially across countries. This has limited the ability to understand the phenomenon of decentralization. To address this empirical ...
متن کامل